4.7 Review

The management of metastatic GIST: current standard and investigational therapeutics

期刊

JOURNAL OF HEMATOLOGY & ONCOLOGY
卷 14, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13045-020-01026-6

关键词

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor; Metastatic GIST; Imatinib; Tyrosine kinase inhibitors

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [P50 CA217694, P50 CA140146, P30 CA008748] Funding Source: Medline
  2. FDA HHS [R01 FD005731] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

GIST is the most common mesenchymal tumor of the gastrointestinal tract, with KIT or PDGFR alpha mutations playing a key role in its development. Imatinib has revolutionized the management of GIST as first line treatment, but patients often experience disease progression after a few years of therapy. New treatment options are being explored for imatinib-refractory GIST.
Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is the most common mesenchymal tumor of the gastrointestinal tract. The majority of GISTs harbor gain of function mutations in either KIT or PDGFR alpha. Determination of the GIST molecular subtype upon diagnosis is important because this information informs therapeutic decisions in both the adjuvant and metastatic setting. The management of GIST was revolutionized by the introduction of imatinib, a KIT inhibitor, which has become the standard first line treatment for metastatic GIST. However, despite a clinical benefit rate of 80%, the majority of patients with GIST experience disease progression after 2-3 years of imatinib therapy. Second and third line options include sunitinib and regorafenib, respectively, and yield low response rates and limited clinical benefit. There have been recent FDA approvals for GIST including ripretinib in the fourth-line setting and avapritinib for PDGFRA exon 18-mutant GIST. This article aims to review the optimal treatment approach for the management of patients with advanced GIST. It examines the standard treatment options available but also explores the novel treatment approaches in the setting of imatinib refractory GIST.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据