4.7 Article

A triple-chamber microbial fuel cell enabled to synchronously recover iron and sulfur elements from sulfide tailings

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 401, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123307

关键词

Microbial fuel cell; Recovery of valuable elements; Sulfide tailings; Bioleaching; Acidithiobacillus species

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program [2016YFC0400707]
  2. Science and Technology Research Project of Hebei Universities

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bioleaching process using a triple-chamber microbial fuel cell showed excellent leaching performance by achieving high efficiency in mining target metals, such as iron and sulfur, from sulfide tailing piles.
Bioleaching by coupling iron oxidization with microbial growth is a process frequently used to extract target metals from sulfide tailing piles. However, the slower leaching, longer operational times, and lower efficiency compared to those of other extracting processes are the most important reasons that make this approach unattractive for the recovery of target elements. A triple-chamber microbial fuel cell (MFC) was explored to elevate the dissolution of sulfide tailings via in-situ removal of bioleached Fe3+/Fe2+ and SO42-, during which iron and SO42- ions were synchronously recovered as Fe(OH)3 and S in the first and second cathode chambers, respectively. 107.9 % of iron and 99.8 % of sulfur contained in the sulfide tailings was bioleached over 50 h, with 80.0 % iron and 22.1 % sulfur elements synchronously recovered. The purifies of the Fe(OH)3 and S precipitates with high metallurgical values were up to 93.1 % and 90.2 %, respectively. The excellent leaching performance of the explored triple-chamber MFC was attributed to the synergistic effect of Acidithiobacillia catalysis and electrochemical oxidation. The explored approach, by virtue of having the higher bioleaching efficiency, less aggressive conditions and shorter operating times than the conventional bioleaching, is of potential commercial value.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据