4.7 Article

Synthetic dyes biodegradation by fungal ligninolytic enzymes: Process optimization, metabolites evaluation and toxicity assessment

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 400, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123254

关键词

Biodecolorization; Synthetic dye; Ligninolytic enzymes; Optimization

资金

  1. CONACyT-Mexico Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia (National Council for Science and Technology) [466181]
  2. CNPq-Brazil Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (National Council for Scientific and Technological Development)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work aimed to provide information that contributes to establishing environmental-friendly methods for synthetic dyes' degradation. The potential decolorization capacity of the crude enzymatic extract produced by Phanerochaete chrysosporium CDBB 686 using corncob as a substrate was evaluated on seven different dyes. Critical variables affecting the in-vitro decolorization process were further evaluated and results were compared with an in-vivo decolorization system. Decolorization with enzymatic extracts presented advantages over the invivo system (higher or similar decolorization within a shorter period). Under improved in-vitro process conditions, the dyes with higher decolorization were: Congo red (41.84 %), Poly R-478 (56.86 %), Methyl green (69.79 %). Attempts were made to confirm the transformation of the dyes after the in-vitro process as well as to establish a molecular basis for interpreting changes in toxicity along with the degradation process. In-vitro degradation products of Methyl green presented a toxicity reduction compared with the original dye; however, increased toxicity was found for Congo red degradation products when compared with the original dyes. Thus, for future applications, it is crucial to evaluate the mechanisms of biodegradation of each target synthetic dye as well as the toxicity of the products obtained after enzymatic oxidation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据