4.5 Article

Inverse multiobjective optimization: Inferring decision criteria from data

期刊

JOURNAL OF GLOBAL OPTIMIZATION
卷 80, 期 1, 页码 3-29

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10898-020-00983-z

关键词

Multiobjective optimization; Inverse optimization; Pareto set; Pareto critical set

资金

  1. Projekt DEAL

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The article presents a method for constructing the objective function vector of a multiobjective optimization problem such that the Pareto critical set contains a given set of data points with prescribed KKT multipliers. By expressing the objectives in a finite-dimensional basis, the problem is transformed into a homogeneous, linear system of equations that can be efficiently solved.
It is a challenging task to identify the objectives on which a certain decision was based, in particular if several, potentially conflicting criteria are equally important and a continuous set of optimal compromise decisions exists. This task can be understood as the inverse problem of multiobjective optimization, where the goal is to find the objective function vector of a given Pareto set. To this end, we present a method to construct the objective function vector of an unconstrained multiobjective optimization problem (MOP) such that the Pareto critical set contains a given set of data points with prescribed KKT multipliers. If such an MOP can not be found, then the method instead produces an MOP whose Pareto critical set is at least close to the data points. The key idea is to consider the objective function vector in the multiobjective KKT conditions as variable and then search for the objectives that minimize the Euclidean norm of the resulting system of equations. By expressing the objectives in a finite-dimensional basis, we transform this problem into a homogeneous, linear system of equations that can be solved efficiently. Potential applications of this approach include the identification of objectives (both from clean and noisy data) and the construction of surrogate models for expensive MOPs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据