4.6 Review

Cumulative evidence for reducing recurrence of colonic diverticular bleeding using endoscopic clipping versus band ligation: Systematic review and meta-analysis

期刊

JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY
卷 36, 期 7, 页码 1738-1743

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jgh.15370

关键词

Colonic diverticular hemorrhage; Endoscopic band ligation; Endoscopic hemoclips; Long-term recurrence

资金

  1. National Center for Global Health and Medicine [30-1020]
  2. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI Grant [JP17K09365, 20K08366]
  3. Takeda Science Foundation
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [20K08366] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Band ligation therapy is more effective than clipping in reducing the recurrence of colonic diverticular hemorrhage, with lower rates of early and late rebleeding, as well as a lower probability of requiring transcatheter arterial embolization or surgery.
Background and Aim: Either clipping or band ligation will become the most common endoscopic treatment for colonic diverticular bleeding (CDB). Rebleeding is a significant clinical outcome of CDB, but there is no cumulative evidence comparing reduction of short-term and long-term rebleeding between them. Thus, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine which endoscopic treatment is more effective to reduce recurrence of CDB. Methods: A comprehensive search of the databases PubMed/MEDLINE and Embase was performed through December 2019. Main outcomes were early and late rebleeding rates, defined as bleeding within 30 days and 1 year of endoscopic therapy for CDB. Initial hemostasis, need for transcatheter arterial embolization, or surgery were also assessed. Overall pooled estimates were calculated. Results: Sixteen studies fulfilled the eligibility criteria, and a total of 790 participants were included. The pooled prevalence of early rebleeding was significantly lower for band ligation than clipping (0.08 vs 0.19; heterogeneity test, P = 0.012). The pooled prevalence of late rebleeding was significantly lower for band ligation than clipping (0.09 vs 0.29; heterogeneity test, P = 0.024). No significant difference of initial hemostasis rate was noted between the two groups. Pooled prevalence of need for transcatheter arterial embolization or surgery was significantly lower for band ligation than clipping (0.01 vs 0.02; heterogeneity test, P = 0.031). There were two cases with colonic diverticulitis due to band ligation but none in clipping. Conclusion: Band ligation therapy was more effective compared with clipping to reduce recurrence of colonic diverticular hemorrhage over short-term and long-term durations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据