4.6 Article

Metabolism of glutamic acid to alanine, proline, and γ-aminobutyric acid during takuan-zuke processing of radish root

期刊

JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE
卷 86, 期 2, 页码 563-570

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1750-3841.15567

关键词

amino acid metabolism; daikon; pickles vegetable; stress response; takuan-zuke

资金

  1. Sasakawa Scientific Research Grant from The Japan Science Society [2018-6006]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study analyzed the free amino acid levels, enzyme activity, and gene expression in takuan-zuke pickles, finding that genes encoding alanine, proline, and GABA synthases were significantly upregulated during dehydration as a cellular stress response. These findings suggest that the biological response of daikon during the pickling process contributes to the health-promoting properties of takuan-zuke.
Takuan-zuke is a traditional Japanese fermented pickle, prepared by dehydration of radish root (daikon) by salt-pressing or sun-drying followed by aging with salt. We previously reported that alanine, proline, and gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) accumulate during daikon dehydration, whereas the level of glutamic acid, their precursor, decreases. We have also reported that dehydration and salt-aging markedly influence the dynamics of free amino acids. In this study, we quantitatively analyzed free amino acid levels, enzyme activity, and gene expression to characterize takuan-zuke amino acid metabolism. Enzyme activities related to alanine, proline, GABA, and glutamic acid metabolism were sustained during dehydration. Moreover, genes encoding alanine, proline, and GABA synthases (ALT1, P5CS1, and GAD4) were significantly upregulated during dehydration. These effects may represent cellular stress responses to the dehydration process. The biological response of daikon contributes to the healthy functional aspects that characterize takuan-zuke. These findings could guide the selection of suitable vegetable varieties to produce pickled vegetables with health-promoting properties.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据