4.7 Article

Automation and robotics in the cultivation of pome fruit: Where do we stand today?

期刊

JOURNAL OF FIELD ROBOTICS
卷 38, 期 4, 页码 513-531

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/rob.22000

关键词

agriculture; automated cultivation; mobile manipulation; orchard tasks; pome fruit

类别

资金

  1. VLAIO Vlaams Agentschap Innoveren en Ondernemen [HBC2019.2051]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The research explores automation options for main orchard tasks as a solution to labor shortages. Despite extensive studies, no fully automated and cost-efficient solution has been developed. Simplifying tree structures and combining multiple techniques into one robot platform could enhance viability of prototypes.
The cultivation of apples and pears in orchards consists of several tasks that still demand much human labor. The cost of this skilled labor increases while the number of competent seasonal workers becomes insufficient. These facts are a threat to the fruit industry. To find a solution, this paper addresses current as well as future automation possibilities for the main orchard tasks as a profitable alternative to human labor. Besides an activity research in pome fruit orchards, this paper contains an overall review of the research and developments that have been performed to automate each major activity (e.g., pruning, thinning, spraying, harvesting and mobile navigating) in the cultivation of pome fruit. These tasks are individually evaluated on feasibility and profitability of the developed automations. Finally, this paper concludes that, despite the large amount of research, almost no fully automated and cost-efficient solution has been developed. A possible option to increase the viability of the prototypes might be the simplification of the tree structures, and consequently the orchard architecture, to make it robot-ready. Another option in this perspective is combining several techniques, for accomplishing individual tasks, in one multipurpose robot platform. As a result, the usability and efficiency of the robot increases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据