4.6 Article

Screening the dermatological potential of plectranthus species components: antioxidant and inhibitory capacities over elastase, collagenase and tyrosinase

期刊

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/14756366.2020.1862099

关键词

Plectranthus; antioxidant; tyrosinase; collagenase; elastase

资金

  1. FCT - Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia [PEst-OE/SAU/UI4013/2014, UID/DTP/04567/2016, UIDB/04567/2020, UIDP/04567/2020, FPU 2019]
  2. University of Alcala
  3. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [UIDP/04567/2020, UIDB/04567/2020] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that extracts from Plectranthus spp. plants have antioxidant and inhibitory effects on skin-related enzymes, with certain isolated compounds showing significant activity against tyrosinase and elastase.
A series of Plectranthus spp. plant extracts (aqueous, acetonic, methanolic and ethyl acetic) obtained from eight different species, and previously isolated compounds (ranging from polyphenols, diterpenes and triterpenes), were assayed for in vitro inhibition of the skin-related enzymes tyrosinase, collagenase and elastase, and for studying their antioxidant properties. The ethyl acetic extracts of P. grandidentatus and P. ecklonii registered the highest antioxidant activity, whereas acetonic, methanolic and ethyl acetic extracts of P. ecklonii, P. grandidentatus, P. madagascariensis and P. saccatus concerning the enzymatic inhibition assays revealed high anti-tyrosinase and anti-collagenase activities. From the isolated compounds tested, abietane diterpenes and triterpenes were highly active against tyrosinase and elastase activity. Overall, the experimental results showed the powerful antioxidant and inhibitory action on skin-related enzymes tyrosinase, collagenase and elastase of Plectranthus spp. extracts and/or isolated compounds, supporting their further research as bioactive metabolites against skin sagging and hyperpigmentation in cosmetic and pharmaceutical formulations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据