4.6 Article

Determination of pyridoxine (vitamin B6) in pharmaceuticals and urine samples using unmodified boron-doped diamond electrode

期刊

DIAMOND AND RELATED MATERIALS
卷 64, 期 -, 页码 184-189

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.diamond.2016.02.018

关键词

Parameters; Optimization; Real samples; DP voltammetry

资金

  1. Ministry of Education and Science of Republic of Serbia [O1172030]
  2. JoinEU-SEE-Penta Erasmus Mundus scholarship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pyridoxine (vitamin B-6, VB6) was detected in pharmaceutical preparation and human urine samples by employing differential pulse voltammetry (DPV) at unmodified boron doped electrode. In Britton-Robinson buffer solution (BRBS) at pH 6, VB6 provides well defined oxidation peak at around +1.05 V vs. Ag/AgCl (3 M KCl). The influence of most of the interferents present in real samples, supporting electrolyte and DPV parameters was investigated. A VB6 sensor with and linear range from 7 to 47 and a detection limit of 3.76 was obtain after optimization. Repeatability of the proposed procedure calculated after 7 measurements of 9 and 30 mu M of VB6 was 3.6 and 2.4%, respectively. Proposed methodology was successfully applied for the determination of VB6 in real samples, and from obtained results, it can be concluded that proposed analytical procedure can be an inexpensive alternative to the widely used separation methods. Prime Novelty statement: This work presents the quantification of vitamin B-6, using differential pulse voltammetry, with boron-doped diamond electrode. BDD electrode is, up to date, one of the best electrode materials, with extremely low background current and negligible passivation. The aim of this study was to develop method for vitamin B-6 determination in various matrices, as can be seen from the results, the obtained procedure shows good recovery values in tested samples and could be a satisfactory replacement to the separation methods and modified electrodes. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据