4.7 Article

Thermal thickening of nitrified liquid phase of digestate for production of concentrated complex fertiliser and high-quality technological water

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
卷 276, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111250

关键词

Digestate; Nitrification; Thermal thickening; Nutrients management; Technological water

资金

  1. Ministry of Agriculture of the Czech Republic under NAZV [QK1710176]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Large production of liquid phase of digestate (LPD) characterised by low dry matter content increases the costs of LPD storage and transportation. Additionally, significant nitrogen losses result from LPD handling. The operation of biogas plants also requires large amounts of technological water, a scarce resource. The method of LPD nitrification and subsequent thermal thickening as a promising alternative treatment able to overcome those problems was investigated. The properties of thermally thickened nitrified LPD and of the distillate derived from vacuum evaporation of nitrified LPD were examined. The results show that over 99.9% of nitrogen was accumulated in thickened nitrified LPD. Total nitrogen (TN) concentration in thickened LPD ranged from 12 to 18 g/L depending on the distillate/thickened LPD volume ratio applied. The thickened LPD was also richer in other nutrients, which indicates its possible use as a concentrated complex fertiliser. TN concentration and conductivity in the distillate did not exceed 6 mg/L and 0.03 mS/m respectively, suggesting that the distillate may be useful as alternative source of technological water. It was concluded that the system consisting of nitrification and subsequent thermal thickening of nitrified LPD yields final products exhibiting significantly superior properties compared to thermal thickening of raw LPD, without requiring any additional chemical agents. The quality of these products is comparable to those obtained through advanced membrane processes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据