4.2 Article

Frontal Bone is Thicker in Women and Frontal Sinus is Larger in Men: A Morphometric Analysis

期刊

JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY
卷 32, 期 5, 页码 1683-1684

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000007256

关键词

Frontal bone; frontal sinus; occipital bone; parietal bone; temporal bone

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found gender differences in skull bone thickness and frontal sinus size, with women having thicker frontal bones and men having larger frontal sinuses.
Cranial bone thickness and frontal sinus size are important parameters to be known before cranial procedures. Deep-learning systems have become popular for making bulk analyses to diagnose diseases/disorders and plan treatment algorithms in diverse fields of medicine. Deep-learning systems would be valuable assets also for cranial procedures. Deep-learning systems need normative values and variances of the population on which they are used. In the present study, the authors aimed to find out the normative values for skull bone thickness at 4 anatomical locations, and frontal sinus size. the authors also analyzed whether gender affected these values. Consecutive adult female and male patients that had presented to our outpatient and emergency clinics between December 2019 and April 2020 were evaluated. We included 174 patients (98 female and 76 male) into the final analysis. Skull bone thickness was measured in 4 anatomical compartments, and vertical dimension of the left and right frontal sinuses were measured. The mean thickness of frontal, parietal, temporal, and occipital bones was 7.9 mm, 9.7 mm, 6 mm, and 10.1 mm for men; 8.7 mm, 10.2 mm, 6.1 mm, and 10.1 mm for women, respectively. Women had significantly thicker frontal bone when compared to men (P = 0.009). Men had significantly larger frontal sinuses compared to women (16.1 mm versus 13.7 mm for right frontal sinus, P = 0.031; 16.4 mm versus 13.9 mm for left frontal sinus, P = 0.023). Women and men had thicker frontal bone, and larger frontal sinuses, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据