4.7 Article

A novel stabilization method for high-order shock fitting with finite element methods

期刊

JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS
卷 430, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2020.110096

关键词

Shock-fitting; High-order finite elements; Moving-grid

资金

  1. NASA [80NSSC18K1698]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A high-order accuracy finite element method has been implemented for flow simulations with shocks by using a moving-grid, shock-fitting approach. The method solves Euler or Navier-Stokes equations on a moving mesh and introduces a stabilization term to ensure convergence behavior. The proposed scheme demonstrates smooth and noise-free surface heating prediction for hypersonic flow over a cylinder with irregular triangular elements.
A moving-grid, shock-fitting, finite element method has been implemented that can achieve high-order accuracy for flow simulations with shocks. In this approach, element edges in the computational mesh are fitted to the shock front and moved with the shock throughout the simulation. The Euler or Navier-Stokes equations are solved on the moving mesh in an arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian framework. The method is implemented in two-dimensions in the context of a streamwise upwind Petrov-Galerkin finite element discretization with unstructured triangular meshes and mesh adaptation. It is shown that the shock interface motion equation has a wave nature, and disturbances can propagate along the shock interface. A SUPG stabilization term is introduced to the interface motion equation that is critical for ensuring that interface disturbances do not lead to nonconvergent solution behavior. The formal order of accuracy of the scheme is verified, and the performance of the proposed scheme is assessed for both inviscid and viscous problems. It was found that the present scheme predicts smooth and noise-free surface heating for hypersonic flow over a cylinder with purely irregular triangular elements. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据