4.8 Article

Endothelial C3a receptor mediates vascular inflammation and blood-brain barrier permeability during aging

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION
卷 131, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

AMER SOC CLINICAL INVESTIGATION INC
DOI: 10.1172/JCI140966

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH [R01 NS093652, R01 AG020670, R01 AG057509, RF1 AG054111, RF1 AG062257]
  2. [NCI-CA125123]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dysfunction of the immune and vascular systems has been implicated in aging and Alzheimer's disease. The complement pathway is a key regulator of innate immunity in the brain. Enhanced C3a/C3aR signaling through endothelial cells can lead to vascular inflammation and blood-brain barrier dysfunction, contributing to neuroinflammation in aging and neurodegenerative disease.
Dysfunction of immune and vascular systems has been implicated in aging and Alzheimer disease; however, their interrelatedness remains poorly understood. The complement pathway is a well-established regulator of innate immunity in the brain. Here, we report robust age-dependent increases in vascular inflammation, peripheral lymphocyte infiltration, and blood-brain barrier (BBB) permeability. These phenotypes were subdued by global inactivation and by endothelial cell-specific ablation of C3ar1. Using an in vitro model of the BBB, we identified intracellular Ca2+ as a downstream effector of C3a/C3aR signaling and a functional mediator of vascular endothelial cadherin junction and barrier integrity. Endothelial C3ar1 inactivation also dampened microglia reactivity and improved hippocampal and cortical volumes in the aging brain, demonstrating a crosstalk between brain vasculature dysfunction and immune cell activation and neurodegeneration. Further, prominent C3aR-dependent vascular inflammation was also observed in a tau-transgenic mouse model. Our studies suggest that heightened C3a/C3aR signaling through endothelial cells promotes vascular inflammation and BBB dysfunction and contributes to overall neuroinflammation in aging and neurodegenerative disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据