4.7 Article

Build the expressway for the salt-tolerant anammox process: Acclimation strategy tells the story

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
卷 278, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123921

关键词

Saline wastewater; Acclimation strategy; Anammox; Inhibition; Mechanism

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province, China [LQ20E080014]
  2. Science and Technology Development Program of Hangzhou, China [20191203B11]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found that the pulsed strategy might be optimal for treating saline wastewater, with the highest nitrogen removal rate observed in R3. Changes in microbial community were identified as the primary reason for different acclimatization results.
The wide existence of saline wastewater has attracted public attention due to its environmental destructiveness. The potential of anammox to treat saline wastewater was systematically evaluated in this study. Three bioreactors with different salinity increasing strategies (R-1: inhibition kinetic; R-2: gradient increasing; R-3: pulsed increasing) were operated to identify the optimal acclimation mode. The results showed that the inhibition of anammox activity by salinity was mainly caused by the loss of enzyme activity. Under the condition of 25.0 g NaCl L-1, the highest nitrogen removal rate of R3 (2.36 +/- 0.14 kg N m(-3) d(-1)) indicated that the pulsed strategy might be optimal. Changes in microbial community might be the primary reason lead to different acclimatization results. The relative abundance of anammox bacteria increased by 37.19% in R-1 and by 46.81% in R-3, but remained stable in R-2 with increasing salinity. Dynamic varations in bacterial interactions, proteins, and functional genes revealed the potential resistance mechanisms of bacteria to salinity. The present work provides a novel approach and guidance for the treatment of nitrogen-rich saline wastewater by the anammox process. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据