4.7 Article

Does corporate green ranking reflect carbon-mitigation performance?

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
卷 277, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123601

关键词

Corporate green ranking; Carbon mitigation performance; Impression management theory; Carbon disclosure project; Climate change

资金

  1. China Scholarship Council (CSC) [201708615057]
  2. Research on the green development path of Yunnan Province, a major project of philosophy and Social Sciences in Yunnan Province [ZDZB201707]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To offer a roadmap for companies to achieve best practices, a new green-ranking system has been launched by the CDP, formerly the Carbon Disclosure Project. This new system, which takes its data from firms' disclosure of their own carbon-reduction efforts, classifies companies into four ranks, namely, A (leadership), B (management), C (awareness) and D (disclosure), where a higher ranking indicates a greener company. This system replaced the old carbon-disclosure scoring system. However, as participation in the survey that collects the data is voluntary, there is a concern that the carbon disclosure could be a green-washing activity, used for impression management. It is not clear whether this new system can resolve this issue. This study investigates whether corporate green rankings are more closely associated with carbon reduction than carbon-disclosure scoring. We use innovative methods to detect green-washing behaviour by examining the degree of correlation between carbon disclosure and performance versus between green rank and performance. Our empirical results show that there a significant positive link between green ranking and carbon performance, whereas a positive association between disclosure scoring and carbon performance is not found under the old carbon-reporting mechanism. This likely means that this new system has to a certain extent reduced green washing in our sample firms, among other implications. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据