4.7 Article

Structural integrity, meltability, and variability of thermal properties in the mixed-linker zeolitic imidazolate framework ZIF-62

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 153, 期 20, 页码 -

出版社

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/5.0031941

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Research Council [681652]
  2. Royal Society [UF150021]
  3. Leverhulme Trust
  4. EPSRC studentship
  5. EPSRC [1937211] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. European Research Council (ERC) [681652] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Metal-organic framework (MOF) glasses have emerged as a new class of melt-quenched glasses; however, so far, all MOF glass production has remained at lab-scale; future applications will require large-scale, commercial production of parent crystalline MOFs. Yet, control of synthetic parameters, such as uniform temperature and mixing, can be challenging, particularly, when scaling-up production of a mixed-linker MOF or a zeolitic imidazolate framework (ZIF). Here, we examine the effect of heterogeneous linker distribution on the thermal properties and melting behavior of ZIF-62. X-ray diffraction (XRD), Raman, and H-1 nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopies revealed little discernable structural difference between samples of ZIF-62 synthesized in our lab and by a commercial supplier. Differential scanning calorimetry and variable temperature/isothermal XRD revealed the samples to have significantly different thermal behavior. Formation of ZIF-zni was identified, which contributed to a dramatic rise in the melting point by around 100 K and also led to the alteration of the macroscopic properties of the final glass. Parameters that might lead to the formation of unexpected phases such as an uneven distribution of linkers were identified, and characterization methods for the detection of unwanted phases are provided. Finally, the need for adequate consideration of linker distribution is stressed when characterizing mixed-linker ZIFs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据