Review of the Challenges that Face Doctoral Education in Chemistry

Effective doctoral education in chemistry has been discussed at length for over a century and is tied to the health of the United States economy. In this literature review, 257 resources relating to doctoral education in chemistry spanning from 1909 to 2019 were collected for the purpose of providing a systematic review of the major issues facing doctoral education in chemistry. A total of eight themes were identified as major issues that were raised consistently throughout the past several decades, some for more than a century. In the current educational system, many researchers believe that doctoral students are (1) overly specialized in their training, (2) ill-prepared for nonacademic careers, (3) ill-prepared for teaching positions, and (4) potentially overproduced compared to genuine job opportunities. Additionally, (5) graduate programs in chemistry have not changed significantly for many decades, (6) single-project funding has greatly impacted the educational experience of doctoral students in both positive and negative ways, (7) the goals of doctoral education revolve around developing students' independent research ability, and (8) the majority of the literature regarding doctoral education is not based on empirical investigations. On one extreme, chemistry faculty and other key stakeholders may view the bleak outlook presented by the literature as a crisis demanding immediate and drastic reform. On the other extreme, they may view the criticisms raised as relatively minor areas of improvement to an otherwise effective system. Regardless of an individual's perspective of the severity of these identified issues, questions are provided that can catalyze discussion to encourage reflections on current practices in local chemistry doctoral programs.

Automated summary

This literature review identifies major issues in doctoral education in chemistry, such as over-specialization, lack of preparation for non-academic careers and teaching positions, and potential overproduction of doctoral students. It also highlights the stagnant nature of graduate programs in chemistry, the emphasis on developing independent research ability, and the lack of empirical investigations in the literature. The identified issues present varying perspectives on the need for reform, with questions raised to stimulate discussion and reflection on current practices in local chemistry doctoral programs.