4.6 Article

Longitudinal relation between blood pressure, antihypertensive use and cerebral blood flow, using arterial spin labelling MRI

期刊

JOURNAL OF CEREBRAL BLOOD FLOW AND METABOLISM
卷 41, 期 7, 页码 1756-1766

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0271678X20966975

关键词

Antihypertensives; arterial spin labeling MRI; blood pressure; cerebral blood flow; hypertension

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found no associations between blood pressure measures and cerebral blood flow, but antihypertensive medication use was associated with lower cerebral blood flow and increased ASL signal heterogeneity.
Consistent cerebral blood flow (CBF) is fundamental to brain function. Cerebral autoregulation ensures CBF stability. Chronic hypertension can lead to disrupted cerebral autoregulation in older people, potentially leading to blood pressure levels interfering with CBF. This study tested whether low BP and AHD use are associated with contemporaneous low CBF, and whether longitudinal change in BP is associated with change in CBF, using arterial spin labelling (ASL) MRI, in a prospective longitudinal cohort of 186 community-dwelling older individuals with hypertension (77 +/- 3 years, 53% female), 125 (67%) of whom with 3-year follow-up. Diastolic blood pressure, systolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure, and pulse pressure were assessed as blood pressure parameters. As additional cerebrovascular marker, we evaluated the ASL signal spatial coefficient of variation (ASL SCoV), a measure of ASL signal heterogeneity that may reflect cerebrovascular health. We found no associations between any of the blood pressure measures and concurrent CBF nor between changes in blood pressure measures and CBF over three-year follow-up. Antihypertensive use was associated with lower grey matter CBF (-5.49 ml/100 g/min, 95%CI = -10.7|-0.27, p = 0.04) and higher ASL SCoV (0.32 SD, 95%CI = 0.12|0.52, p = 0.002). These results warrant future research on the potential relations between antihypertensive use and cerebral perfusion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据