4.6 Article

The Effect of an Exercise Intervention Program on Bone Health After Bariatric Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

期刊

JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH
卷 36, 期 3, 页码 489-499

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.4213

关键词

BIOCHEMICAL MARKERS OF BONE TURNOVER; CLINICAL TRIALS; DXA; EXERCISE; INDENTATION (NANO; MICRO)

资金

  1. Foundation for Science and Technology of Portugal (FCT) [PTDC/DTP-DES/0968/2014, SFRH/BD/117622/2016, SFRH/BD/146976/2019, UI/BD/150673/2020, UID/MAT/04106/2019, UIDB/00617/2020]
  2. European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) through the Operational Competitiveness Programme (COMPETE) [POCI-01-0145-FEDER-016707]
  3. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [UI/BD/150673/2020, UIDB/00617/2020] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Exercise program is an effective strategy to improve bone health in post-bariatric surgery patients, especially in terms of lumbar spine bone mineral density. Patients participating in exercise also showed higher lean mass and more high impacts compared to the control group.
Exercise has been suggested as a therapeutic approach to attenuate bone loss induced by bariatric surgery (BS), but its effectiveness remains unclear. Our aim was to determine if an exercise-training program could induce benefits on bone mass after BS. Eighty-four patients, submitted to gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy, were randomized to either exercise (EG) or control group (CG). One month post-BS, EG underwent a 11-month supervised multicomponent exercise program, while CG received only standard medical care. Patients were assessed before BS and at 1, 6, and 12 months post-BS for body composition, areal bone mineral density (BMD), bone turnover markers, calciotropic hormones, sclerostin, bone material strength index, muscle strength, and daily physical activity. A primary analysis was conducted according to intention-to-treat principles and the primary outcome was the between-group difference on lumbar spine BMD at 12 months post-BS. A secondary analysis was also performed to analyze if the exercise effect depended on training attendance. Twelve months post-BS, primary analysis results revealed that EG had a higher BMD at lumbar spine (+0.024 g center dot cm(-2) [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.004, 0.044]; p = .015) compared with CG. Among total hip, femoral neck, and 1/3 radius secondary outcomes, only 1/3 radius BMD improved in EG compared with CG (+0.013 g center dot cm(-2) [95% CI 0.003, 0.023]; p = .020). No significant exercise effects were observed on bone biochemical markers or bone material strength index. EG also had a higher lean mass (+1.5 kg [95% CI 0.1, 2.9]; p = .037) and higher number of high impacts (+51.4 [95% CI 6.6, 96.1]; p = .026) compared with CG. In addition, secondary analysis results suggest that exercise-induced benefits may be obtained on femoral neck BMD but only on those participants with >= 50% exercise attendance compared with CG (+5.3% [95% CI 2.0, 8.6]; p = .006). Our findings suggest that an exercise program is an effective strategy to ameliorate bone health in post-BS patients. (c) 2020 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据