4.6 Article

Learning multimorbidity patterns from electronic health records using Non-negative Matrix Factorisation

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL INFORMATICS
卷 112, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2020.103606

关键词

Non-negative Matrix Factorisation; Multimorbidity; Temporal phenotyping; Disease trajectories; Electronic health records

资金

  1. Oxford Martin School (OMS), United Kingdom
  2. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Oxford Biomedical Research Centre (BRC), United Kingdom

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Multimorbidity, or the presence of several medical conditions in the same individual, has been increasing in the population - both in absolute and relative terms. Nevertheless, multimorbidity remains poorly understood, and the evidence from existing research to describe its burden, determinants and consequences has been limited. Previous studies attempting to understand multimorbidity patterns are often cross-sectional and do not explicitly account for multimorbidity patterns' evolution over time; some of them are based on small datasets and/or use arbitrary and narrow age ranges; and those that employed advanced models, usually lack appropriate benchmarking and validations. In this study, we (1) introduce a novel approach for using Non negative Matrix Factorisation (NMF) for temporal phenotyping (i.e., simultaneously mining disease clusters and their trajectories); (2) provide quantitative metrics for the evaluation of these clusters and trajectories; and (3) demonstrate how the temporal characteristics of the disease clusters that result from our model can help mine multimorbidity networks and generate new hypotheses for the emergence of various multimorbidity patterns over time. We trained and evaluated our models on one of the world's largest electronic health records (EHR) datasets, containing more than 7 million patients, from which over 2 million where relevant to, and hence included in this study.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据