4.5 Article

Do humans exploit the metabolic and mechanical benefits of arm swing across slow to fast walking speeds?

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS
卷 115, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2020.110181

关键词

Energetics; Metabolic power; Cost of transport; Locomotion biomechanics; Free vertical moment

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Arm swing can reduce net metabolic cost at intermediate and fast walking speeds, while showing no significant advantage at slow speeds.
Humans naturally select conditions to minimize their net cost of transport (COT) during walking. One way to do this is by exploiting the mechanical benefit of arm swing which reduces whole-body rotation about the vertical axis and thus, minimizes the free vertical moment (FVM) that the foot applies to the ground. Humans appear to exploit these benefits of arm swing at speeds that are considered optimal, but we sought to determine if these benefits are conserved across slow to fast walking speeds. If true, arm swing may be a key feature that helps to minimize the net COT regardless of one's walking speed. We hypothesized that at all speeds, walking with arm swing would be less costly compared to walking without arm swing. As a secondary aim, we also explored if reductions in the peak FVM could explain the metabolic benefits of arm swing. Twenty-one young, healthy subjects walked with and without arm swing at speeds ranging from 0.50 to 2.00 m/s while we recorded metabolic, kinematic and kinetic data. At slow speeds (<= 1.00 m/s), net COT was similar when walking with or without arm swing (p > 0.05). However, at intermediate and fast speeds (>1.00 m/s), arm swing reduced the net COT by similar to 7-13% (all p's < 0.05). Additionally, peak FVM magnitudes decreased with arm swing, suggesting that it may partially explain the metabolic benefit of arm swing. Overall, we find that arm swing provides a net metabolic benefit during walking, but this benefit is constrained to intermediate and fast walking speeds. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据