4.6 Article

Revision Surgery for Instability After Total Hip Arthroplasty: Does Timing Matter?

期刊

JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY
卷 36, 期 5, 页码 1779-+

出版社

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE INC MEDICAL PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.12.035

关键词

total hip arthroplasty; THA; instability; dislocation; early revision

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Revision surgery for instability within the first 3 months postoperatively is associated with higher risk of periprosthetic joint infection compared to later revisions. However, revisions performed within 9 months of the index surgery may have lower rates of subsequent instability than those performed after 12 months, possibly due to differences in acetabular revision and head-liner exchange rates.
Background: Instability is a common reason for revision surgery after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Recent studies suggest that revisions performed in the early postoperative period are associated with higher complication rates. The purpose of this study is to assess the effect of timing of revision for instability on subsequent complication rates. Methods: The Medicare Part A claims database was queried from 2010 to 2017 to identify revision THAs for instability. Patients were divided based on time between index and revision surgeries: <1, 1-2, 2-3, 36, 6-9, 9-12, and >12 months. Complication rates were compared between groups using multivariate analyses to adjust for demographics and comorbidities. Results: Of 445,499 THAs identified, 9298 (2.1%) underwent revision for instability. Revision THA within 3 months had the highest rate of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI): 14.7% at <1 month, 12.7% at 1-2 months, and 10.6% at 2-3 months vs 6.9% at >12 months (P <.001). Adjusting for confounding factors, PJI risk remained elevated at earlier periods: <1 month (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.84, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.51-2.23, P <.001), 1-2 months (aOR: 1.45, 95% CI: 1.16-1.82, P = .001), 2-3 months (aOR: 1.35, 95% CI: 1.02-1.78, P = .036). However, revisions performed within 9 months of index surgery had lower rates of subsequent instability than revisions performed >12 months (aOR: 0.67-0.85, P < .050), which may be due to lower rates of acetabular revision and higher rates of head-liner exchange in this later group. Conclusion: When dislocation occurs in the early postoperative period, delaying revision surgery beyond 3 months from the index procedure may be warranted to reduce risk of PJI. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据