4.6 Article

Synthesis of stimuli-responsive ionic cyclopolymers in search of phosphorous-free antiscalants

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED POLYMER SCIENCE
卷 138, 期 19, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/app.50402

关键词

applications; copolymers; polyelectrolytes; radical polymerization; stimuli‐ sensitive polymers

资金

  1. Saudi Aramco [CHEM 2417]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study showed that a series of new pH-responsive alternate copolymers can be synthesized through cyclopolymerization, some of which exhibit excellent antiscalant properties in reverse osmosis plants, and also demonstrate some corrosion inhibition efficiency in mildly acidic environments.
Ammonium persulfate-initiated cyclopolymerization of maleic acid (HO2CC=CCO2H) (MA) with diallylamine (-NR2, R = CH2 = CH-CH2) derivatives (DADs): R2NH+CH2CO2- (I), R2NCH2CO2-Na+ (II), R2NCH2CO2Et (III), R2NH+(CH2)(3)CO2- (IV), R2N(CH2)(3)CO2Et (V), R2NH+(CH2)(3)SO3- (VI) and R2N(CH2)(3)SO3-Na+ (VII) gave a series of new pH-responsive alternate copolymers: -[(DAD-alt-MA)](n)- VIII-XIV, respectively. Homopolymers XV and XVI of the corresponding monomers IV and V center dot HCl were also synthesized. The evaluation of the synthesized polymers as potential antiscalants in reverse osmosis (RO) plants was examined. An effective scale inhibitor must arrest the formation of scale for a residence time (approximate to 15 min) of feed water in the RO chamber. R2NH+(CH2)(3)CO2- (IV)-alt-MA copolymer XI at a concentration of 5 ppm imparted 99% scale inhibition for 360 min, while at 2.5 and 1 ppm concentrations, the CaSO4 scale inhibitions were found to be 99% and approximate to 100% during 120 and 20 min, respectively, at 40 degrees C. Homopolymers XV and XVI, at a 20-ppm concentration, demonstrated approximate to 95% efficiency in inhibiting mild steel corrosion in 1 M HCl. In some important oilfield applications, requirement of simultaneous scale and corrosion inhibition make these polymers potential candidates for desalination and oilfield applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据