4.7 Article

Large magnetocaloric effects in Pr-doped La1.4-xPrxCa1.6Mn2O7 bilayer manganites

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 845, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.156218

关键词

Magnetocaloric properties; Ruddlesden-Popper phase; Magnetization; Temperature averaged entropy change (TEC); Magnetic refrigeration

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea - Korean government [2018R1D1A1B07046937]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2018R1D1A1B07046937] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Controlled substitution of Praseodymium (Pr) in place of Lanthanum (La) was performed in La1.4-xPrxCa1.6Mn2O7 (x = 0.0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3 and 0.4) to explore a possible enhancement in the magnetic and magnetocaloric properties of the material. The samples were produced following the solid-state reaction route. Rietveld refined XRD profiling was used that established the bilayer tetragonal structure (I4/mmm) of the Ruddlesden-Popper Phase in all compositions. Significant variations in the unit cell parameter were observed upon incorporation of Pr in place of La. Ferromagnetic to paramagnetic transitions were confirmed from the temperature dependent magnetization. Against the pristine sample, multiple folds increase was achieved in the values of magnetic entropy change (Delta S-M) as well as the temperature averaged entropy change (TEC) with controlled Pr-substitution in the doped samples. Highest Delta S-M and TEC (Delta TH-C = 10 K) values of 6.16 J kg(-1)K(-1) and 8.329 J kg(-1)K(-1) respectively were obtained in the x >= 0.3 samples at 2.5 T applied field. Our findings in this work suggest giant magnetocaloric effects in the Pr-doped samples and support the possibility of further tailoring these materials for applications in magnetic refrigeration technology. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据