4.7 Article

A scalable approach for functionalization of TiO2 nanotube arrays with g-C3N4 for enhanced photo-electrochemical performance

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 846, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.155881

关键词

TiO2 nanotube; Graphitic carbon nitride; G-C3N4/TiO2 nanotubes; Photo-electro chemical process; Photocurrent; Charge separation and transport

资金

  1. Department of Science and Technology, Government of India [SR/WOSeA/PMe97/2016]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4) has manifested itself as an effective counterpart of titanium di-oxide (TiO2) to extend its photoactivity in the visible range. In this work, g-C3N4 functionalized TiO2 nanotubes were synthesized by electrodeposition of g-C3N4 in bulk on TiO2 nanotubes from a continuously rotating organic suspension at a moderate voltage (similar to 90 V). Additionally, samples with varying time durations were also synthesized to examine the effect of electrodeposition time on the performance of g-C3N4 functionalized TiO2 nanotubes. Photo-electrochemical measurements demonstrated strong light induced activity, with a photocurrent density of 0.14 mA/cm(2) at 1 V vs Ag/AgCl in 1 M Na2SO4 electrolyte. Maximum photoresponse for g-C3N4 functionalized TiO2 nanotubes was upto 4 factors higher than bare TiO2 nanotubes. The crystallinity, morphology and chemical compositions were investigated by XRD, FESEM and XPS respectively. Further, the optical absorption edge, chemical bonds and defects states were evaluated by UV-visible, Raman, FTIR, PL and EPR spectroscopy. The properties of g-C3N4/TiO2 system were correlated with the photocurrent behaviour and a mechanism of the probable role of vacancies and defects in their photo induced activity has been proposed. The study has established a simple and scalable scheme for the functionalization of TiO2 nanotube with g-C3N4 to achieve enhanced photoelectrochemical properties. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据