4.7 Article

Ligand-metal charge transfer mechanism enhances TiO2/Bi2WO6/rGO nanomaterials photocatalytic efficient degradation of norfloxacin under visible light

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 869, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.158679

关键词

Photocatalytic; RGO; Norfloxacin; Escherichia col; Ligand-metal charge transfer

资金

  1. Key-Area Research and Development Program of Guangdong Province [2019B020223002]
  2. Projects in the Field of International Scientific and Technological Cooperation of Guangdong province [2018A050506076]
  3. Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Conservation and Precision Utilization of Characteristic Agricultural Resources in Mountainous Areas

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study prepared TiO2/Bi2WO6/rGO nanocomposite materials and found that they exhibit higher photocatalytic activity under visible light, making it a potential technology to address the threat of antibiotic overuse on water security.
Overuse of antibiotics threatens water security, and photocatalysis is a potential technology to alleviate this problem. In this study, the TiO2/Bi2WO6/rGO nanocomposite materials were prepared by a solvothermal process, and a series of characterizations were carefully examined. Then, the removal of norfloxacin from water under visible light irradiation was investigated to evaluate the photocatalytic activity of TiO2/Bi2WO6/rGO. The TiO2/Bi2WO6/rGO composite catalyst has higher photocatalytic activity than TiO2 and TiO2/Bi2WO6 under visible light, and the optimal addition content for rGO is 0.5%. After 60 min of visible light irradiation, the degradation rate of norfloxacin on TiO2/Bi2WO6/rGO-0.5% reached 87.79%. Furthermore, the UV-Vis of the complex suggests that the ligand-metal electron transfer mechanism enhances the catalytic activity of TiO2/Bi2WO6/rGO. Finally, the mechanism of photocatalytic degradation of norfloxacin by TiO2/Bi2WO6/rGO composite catalyst was proposed. (C) 2021 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据