4.7 Article

Spark plasma sintering of Ti-Ni-TiCN composites: Microstructural characterization, densification and mechanical properties

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 848, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.156559

关键词

Metal matrix composites; In-situ TiN; Spark plasma sintering; TiCN nanoceramic; Compressive strength

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of South Africa [117867]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ti-Ni-TiCN composites with varying TiCN contents (5,10 and 15 wt%) were consolidated using the novel spark plasma sintering technique at a sintering temperature of 1100 degrees C, for 10 min holding time under a vacuum condition of lower than 4 Pa, 100 degrees C/min heating rate and applied pressure of 50 MPa. The effects of Ni additive and TiCN nanoceramic reinforcement content on densification, microstructure and mechanical properties of the developed composites were investigated. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) equipped with energy dispersive X-ray spectroscope (EDS) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) techniques were employed to study the morphology and phases present in the developed composites. SEM results revealed the presence of undissolved particles and lamella arrangements of phases within the matrix of the sintered composites which were confirmed by the EDS and XRD results as undissolved TiCN particles, in-situ formed TiN and Ti2Ni intermetallic phases. The relative density of the sintered compacts decreased from 99.3% to 98.23% with increase in the reinforcement content. The hardness of the sintered composites was found to increase with increasing reinforcement content. Compressive test results indicated that Ti-Ni-TiCN composites displayed improved compressive strength than the pure Ti samples. The optimum properties were obtained in Ti-6Ni-10TiCN composite with Vickers hardness of 398 HV10, compressive yield and ultimate strengths of about 998 MPa and 1156 MPa respectively. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据