4.7 Article

Enhanced cycling stability of hierarchical Cu2WS4/C hollow octahedron anode for lithium-ion batteries by tuning its potential window

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 851, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.156730

关键词

Transition metal sulfide; Potential window; Ether-based electrolyte; Anode material; Lithium-ion battery

资金

  1. Shanxi Province Science Foundation for Youths [RD2000002002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By tuning the operating potential window, the cycling performance of Cu2WS4/C anode can be optimized, delivering a high reversible capacity of 400 mAh/g at 0.2 A/g and showing excellent cycling stability in the optimized potential window 1.0-2.5 V. The hierarchical hollow octahedral structure, suppressed polysulfides dissolution in ether-based electrolyte, and enhanced reversibility of electrochemical reaction all contribute to its superior electrochemical performance.
The operating potential window is critical for enhancing the cycling stability of transition metal sulfide anode, because the lithium ion storage mechanism strongly depends on it. Herein, we report hierarchical hollow octahedral nanostructured Cu2WS4/C composites prepared by a polyvinylpyrrolidone-assisted solvothermal process, and their lithium-ion storage behavior. It has been demonstrated that the surfactant is a key factor that affects the morphology of Cu2WS4/C. By tuning the operating potential window, the cycling performance of Cu2WS4/C anode can be optimized, which delivers a high reversible capacity of 400 mAh/g at 0.2 A/g and displays excellent cycling stability in the optimized potential window 1.0-2.5 V. The volume expansion can be accommodated by hierarchical hollow octahedral structure, suppressed polysulfides dissolution in ether-based electrolyte, and enhanced reversibility of electrochemical reaction in the optimized potential window all contribute to its superior electrochemical performance. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据