4.7 Article

Comparison of Efficacy and Detection of Clethodim and Glyphosate Applied with Dicamba and 2,4-D through Tank Mixture and Sequential Applications

期刊

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 69, 期 1, 页码 101-111

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.0c05541

关键词

herbicide; antagonism; glyphosate; clethodim; dicamba; 2,4-D; LC/MS-MS; QuEChERS

资金

  1. Mississippi Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station (MAFES) Specialty Research Initiative Grant
  2. USDA Hatch Project Funds [MIS-522070]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study showed that the auxin applied second method performed better in terms of control ratings and biomass weights when treating herbicides.
Greenhouse studies were planted at the R.R. Foil Plant Science Research Center in Starkville, MS. In the efficacy trial, pots were seeded with barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli), broadleaf signalgrass (Urochloa platyphylla), and giant foxtail (Setaria faberi). In the lab detection trial, only barnyardgrass was seeded. Both studies consisted of 16 treatments with four replications per treatment. The treatments consisted of clethodim, glyphosate, dicamba, and 2,4-D applied singularly and in combination with each other. Each herbicide combination was applied with three application methods: tank mixture, sequential applications where the synthetic auxin was applied first (auxin applied first), and sequential applications where glyphosate or clethodim was applied first (auxin applied second). The auxin applied second method had higher visual estimations of control ratings and lower biomass weights compared to the other two methods. The auxin applied second method had more glyphosate and clethodim detected with the use of liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据