4.3 Article

Measurement of electron temperature and density of atmospheric-pressure non-equilibrium argon plasma examined with optical emission spectroscopy

期刊

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.35848/1347-4065/abd0c8

关键词

atmospheric-pressure non-equilibrium plasma; electron temperature and density; plasma spectroscopic measurement; continuum emission measurement; argon collisional-radiative model

资金

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [19H01867]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [19H01867] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The electron temperature and density of atmospheric-pressure non-equilibrium dielectric barrier discharge argon plasma were measured using optical emission spectroscopy. The results show that the electron energy distribution function significantly affects the accuracy of the measurements, with the Druyvesteyn EEDF producing better results compared to the Maxwellian EEDF. Additionally, experimental observations of excited state line intensities of the Ar atom confirmed the validity of the values obtained from the CR model calculations.
The electron temperature T-e and density N-e of atmospheric-pressure non-equilibrium dielectric barrier discharge argon (Ar) plasma are measured with optical emission spectroscopy. Continuum emission due to bremsstrahlung is applied to the analysis of the electron temperature and density with the spectrometric system in the visible wavelength range calibrated absolutely. The assumption of the Maxwellian electron energy distribution function (EEDF) results in T-e 0.29 eV and N-e 1.1 x 10(16) cm(-3), whereas the Druyvesteyn EEDF leads to the result T-e 0.79 eV and N-e 1.4 x 10(14) cm(-3). To confirm the validity of these values, several line intensities of the excited states of the Ar atom are observed experimentally and compared with the theoretical population densities calculated by the Ar collisional-radiative (CR) model that includes atomic collisional processes. It is confirmed that the order of the observed excited-state number densities agrees well with that calculated numerically by the CR model with the Druyvesteyn EEDF, while the Maxwellian EEDF gives poor results. (c) 2021 The Japan Society of Applied Physics

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据