4.8 Article

Fungal foraging behaviour and hyphal space exploration in micro-structured Soil Chips

期刊

ISME JOURNAL
卷 15, 期 6, 页码 1782-1793

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41396-020-00886-7

关键词

-

资金

  1. Swedish research council [VR-621-2014-5912]
  2. Crafoord foundation
  3. Wallenberg foundation
  4. BECC

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By monitoring the hyphal growth behavior and strategies of seven Basidiomycete litter decomposing species in a micro-fabricated Soil Chip system, it was found that these species showed significantly different responses to various obstacles, and hyphal behavior cannot be solely predicted based on ecological assumptions.
How do fungi navigate through the complex microscopic maze-like structures found in the soil? Fungal behaviour, especially at the hyphal scale, is largely unknown and challenging to study in natural habitats such as the opaque soil matrix. We monitored hyphal growth behaviour and strategies of seven Basidiomycete litter decomposing species in a micro-fabricated Soil Chip system that simulates principal aspects of the soil pore space and its micro-spatial heterogeneity. The hyphae were faced with micrometre constrictions, sharp turns and protruding obstacles, and the species examined were found to have profoundly different responses in terms of foraging range and persistence, spatial exploration and ability to pass obstacles. Hyphal behaviour was not predictable solely based on ecological assumptions, and our results obtained a level of trait information at the hyphal scale that cannot be fully explained using classical concepts of space exploration and exploitation such as the phalanx/guerrilla strategies. Instead, we propose a multivariate trait analysis, acknowledging the complex trade-offs and microscale strategies that fungal mycelia exhibit. Our results provide novel insights about hyphal behaviour, as well as an additional understanding of fungal habitat colonisation, their foraging strategies and niche partitioning in the soil environment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据