4.4 Article

Artificial intelligence approach to estimating rice yield

期刊

IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE
卷 70, 期 4, 页码 732-742

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ird.2566

关键词

ANN; drainage; genetic programming; lysimeter; rice yield; Resume

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study estimated rice crop yield in Iran using artificial neural networks (ANNs) and ANN-genetic programming (GP). Results showed that ANN-GP was more accurate than stand-alone ANN, with irrigation, drainage, and soil type parameters having the most significant impact on rice yield at 36%, 28%, and 31% respectively. This proposed method can be an efficient tool for estimating rice yield and aiding decision makers in managing and developing agricultural systems.
After wheat, rice is one of the most important agricultural products in the world, and Iran has a special position here with annual production of more than 2 million t of rice. Evaluation of crop yield has an important role in agricultural policy making due to different conditions and restrictions. Estimating rice yield is a key factor in food security. Any change in the effective parameters can cause changes in rice yield and therefore the food security of the population will be affected. In this study, rice crop yield was estimated by artificial neural networks (ANNs) and ANN-genetic programming (GP) in 2011 and 2015. Rainfall, permeability, soil texture, land type, evapotranspiration and inlet and inflow and outflow water to paddy lands were used as inputs. The results showed that the ANN-GP with a root mean square error (RMSE = 80.8 kg ha?(1)) and a correlation coefficient (CC = 0.91) was more accurate than the stand-alone ANN (with RMSE = 139 kg ha?(1) and CC = 0.67). Finally, the effect of each input parameter on rice yield was evaluated. Irrigation, drainage and soil type parameters had the best impact rank, with 36, 28 and 31%, respectively. Therefore, the proposed method can act as an efficient tool in estimating rice yield and help decision makers to manage and develop the agricultural system.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据