4.5 Article

Molecular modeling of electrolyte and polysulfide ions for lithium-sulfur batteries

期刊

IONICS
卷 27, 期 2, 页码 635-642

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11581-020-03860-7

关键词

Molecular simulations; Solvated ions; Desolvated ions; LiTFSI in DOL/DME; LiPF6 in EC/DMC; Polysulfides

资金

  1. Faraday project LiSTAR [EP/S003053/1, FIRG014]
  2. EPSRC project HiPoBat [EP/R022852/1]
  3. EPSRC [EP/S003053/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Key challenges in developing Li-S battery technology include the diffusion of Li+ in sulfur-filled micropores and minimizing the shuttling of polysulfides. Ion dimensions in different forms play a crucial role in determining the transport rate.
The operation of a lithium-sulfur (Li-S) battery involves the transport of Li+ ions and soluble sulfides mostly in the form of solvated ions. Key challenges in the development of Li-S battery technology are the diffusion of Li+ in micropores filled with sulfur and eliminating the shuttling of polysulfides. Ion dimensions in solvated and desolvated forms are key parameters determining the diffusion coefficient and the rate of transport of such ions, while constrictivity effects due to the effect of pore size compared to ion size control both transport and filling of the pores. We present molecular simulations to determine the solvation parameters of electrolyte ions and sulfides S-2(2-), S-4(2-), S-6(2-), and S-8(2-) in two different electrolyte systems: LiTFSI in DOL/DME and LiPF6 in EC/DMC. The calculated parameters include the coordination number and the geometrically optimized model and dimensions, using the van der Waals surface approach, of the solvated and desolvated ions. The desolvation energy of the electrolyte ions is also calculated. Such data is useful for the modeling and design of the pore sizes of cathode host materials to be able to accommodate the different sulfides while minimizing their shuttling between cathode and anode.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据