4.7 Article

Different modes of heat transfer and crystallization in a drop of NaCl solution: The influence of key factors on the crystallization rate and the heat transfer coefficient

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2020.106602

关键词

Heat transfer; Evaporation rate; Crystallization rates; Salt solutions

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Experimental studies on evaporation, crystallization, and heat transfer in a droplet of NaCl/H2O solution have shown that supersaturation and heating of the wall significantly affect the process. Four characteristic modes of evaporation and crystallization are distinguished, with the ratio of the crystallization rate to the evaporation rate being highly variable and regulated by Marangoni convection. The data obtained provide insights for the development of high-temperature crystallization concepts in the presence of intense Marangoni flow.
Evaporation, crystallization and heat transfer in a droplet of NaCl/H2O solution have been studied experimentally. Crystallization began at the edges of the droplet at solution supersaturation S = 1.94 (S = C-sup/C-sat, where C-sup is the salt concentration in a metastable region (supersaturation), and C-sat corresponds to saturation), which is noticeably higher than the previously obtained supersaturation for the droplet, micmcapillary, and when using surfactant. When the droplet evaporated on the heated wall, the supersaturation of the salt solution was noticeably higher than when evaporating without heating. Four characteristic modes of evaporation and crystallization are distinguished. The ratio of the crystallization rate to the evaporation rate (j(cr)/j(ev)) may be both substantially greater and less than one. It is shown that the heat transfer and the crystallization rate are regulated by Marangoni convection. The data obtained are of interest for the development of modern concepts of high-temperature crystallization in the presence of intense Marangoni flow.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据