4.3 Article

YouTube as a source of information on fibromyalgia

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RHEUMATIC DISEASES
卷 24, 期 2, 页码 197-202

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1756-185X.14043

关键词

DISCERN; fibromyalgia; internet; quality; YouTube

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluated the content and quality of YouTube videos as a source of patient information for fibromyalgia (FM), and found that the majority of videos have poor quality.
Aim The internet has gained popularity as a health information source for patients. YouTube is one of the biggest platforms used worldwide. Several studies showed that quality of the information on YouTube videos for patient information is poor. This study aimed to evaluate the content and quality of YouTube videos, as a source of patient information for fibromyalgia (FM). Methods In this cross-sectional study, a YouTube search with the keyword fibromyalgia was performed, and the first 200 videos were listed according to relevancy. Advertisements, duplicate videos, videos in languages other than English, and videos without audio were excluded. Video features (number of likes, dislikes, views, length of video), and source of upload were recorded. DISCERN and Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria were used for quality analysis. Video quality was assessed according to the source of upload and video features. The correlation analysis was performed between video features, JAMA, and DISCERN scores. Results A total number of 102 videos were analyzed. The most common source of upload was physicians and majority of the content (55.8%) was about symptoms and treatment. Mean DISCERN and JAMA scores were 35.7 and 2.2, respectively. These scores were highest in videos uploaded by physicians (52.7 and 2.6, respectively). There is a positive correlation between the duration of the video, DISCERN, and JAMA scores. Conclusion The majority of YouTube content has poor quality. Health professionals should be aware of the importance of health-related information on YouTube and provide high-quality accurate and up-to-date content.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据