4.6 Article

DBSCAN-based point cloud extraction for Tomographic synthetic aperture radar (TomoSAR) three-dimensional (3D) building reconstruction

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING
卷 42, 期 6, 页码 2327-2349

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/01431161.2020.1851062

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61501019, 41801229]
  2. Scientific Research Project of the Beijing Educational Committee [SQKM201710016008]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture [18209]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The proposed method for point cloud extraction using the DBSCAN algorithm is more effective in preserving building structures and accurately detecting and rejecting noise and false targets compared to linear detection methods.
Tomographic synthetic aperture radar (TomoSAR) has been widely used in three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction of urban buildings. However, due to the baseline distribution and the limitations of the algorithm itself, the building point cloud after tomographic imaging is flooded by substantial noise and/or false targets. Thus, TomoSAR point clouds must be extracted from these unwanted factors to reconstruct the building structure. Existing line-based extraction methods can only detect straight lines, which results in the loss of non-linear point clouds. Thus, inspired by density clustering, we propose a point cloud extraction method using the Density-Based Spatial Clustering of Applications with Noise (DBSCAN) algorithm. The DBSCAN can preserve the building structure more completely by enabling the extraction of various shapes of the buildings. Since the detection of point clouds is density-based, noise and false targets that exhibit low-density distribution can be accurately detected and rejected. The experimental results demonstrated the effectiveness of our method for TomoSAR point cloud extraction, as well as the structural protection of buildings, which achieves a higher extraction accuracy compared to linear detection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据