4.5 Article

LaFeSi-based magnetocaloric material analysis: Cyclic endurance and thermal performance results *

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REFRIGERATION
卷 124, 期 -, 页码 43-51

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2020.12.004

关键词

Magnetic refrigeration; Active magnetic regenerator; Magnetocaloric materials; LaFeSi; Experimental results

资金

  1. CoolMagEvo project [ANR-17-CE05-0036]
  2. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-17-CE05-0036] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents the optimization of LaFeSi-based alloys for magnetocaloric applications, including experimental results with specific layering of materials with different Curie temperatures. The potential of LaFeSi-based alloys to replace Gd-based alloys and increase cooling power while reducing costs is demonstrated through endurance testing.
Recently, a lot of progress has been made by the community to optimize the properties of LaFeSi-based alloys in order to enable their integration into prototypes for different magnetocaloric applications. In this paper we present a set of experimental results obtained with a specific layering of materials having different Curie tem peratures integrated into a rotating R&D prototype. The prototype was tested under different operating conditions and the results are presented here. Furthermore, two types of endurance tests were performed on those materials using a separate experimental test bench. The obtained results are promising and present the basis for a possible replacement of Gd-based alloys with first order LaFeSi-based alloys to be used in our ready-to-be-deployed magnetic refrigeration systems. LaFeSi-based alloys have the potential to increase the cooling power and reduce the cost of our units due to reduced raw material costs. This is a critical factor, which will make the technology more accessible for large-scale production. (c) 2020 Elsevier Ltd and IIR. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据