4.7 Article

Initial Feasibility and Clinical Implementation of Daily MR-Guided Adaptive Head and Neck Cancer Radiation Therapy on a 1.5T MR-Linac System: Prospective R-IDEAL 2a/2b Systematic Clinical Evaluation of Technical Innovation

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.12.015

关键词

-

资金

  1. DFG
  2. Elekta AB
  3. Philips
  4. NIH/NIDCR
  5. NIH/National Cancer Institute (NCI)
  6. NIH/National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering
  7. University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study is the first report of daily adaptive radiation therapy for head and neck cancer using a 1.5T MR-linac, focusing on safety, feasibility, and dosimetric results. The results demonstrate that daily ART using an online ATP workflow is safe, clinically feasible, and results in consistent delivered doses with planned doses for HNC patients.
Purpose: This prospective study is, to our knowledge, the first report of daily adaptive radiation therapy (ART) for head and neck cancer (HNC) using a 1.5T magnetic resonance imaging-linear accelerator (MR-linac) with particular focus on safety and feasibility and dosimetric results of an online rigid registration-based adapt to position (ATP) workflow. Methods and Materials: Ten patients with HNC received daily ART on a 1.5T/7MV MR-linac, 6 using ATP only and 4 using ATP with 1 offline adapt-to-shape replan. Setup variability with custom immobilization masks was assessed by calculating the mean systematic error (M), standard deviation of the systematic error (Sigma), and standard deviation of the random error (sigma) of the isocenter shifts. Quality assurance was performed with a cylindrical diode array using 3%/3 mm gamma criteria. Adaptive treatment plans were summed for each patient to compare the delivered dose with the planned dose from the reference plan. The impact of dosimetric variability between adaptive fractions on the summation plan doses was assessed by tracking the number of optimization constraint violations at each individual fraction. Results: The random errors (mm) for the x, y, and z isocenter shifts, respectively, were M = -0.3, 0.7, 0.1; Sigma = 3.3, 2.6, 1.4; and sigma = 1.7, 2.9, 1.0. The median (range) gamma pass rate was 99.9% (90.9%-100%). The differences between the reference and summation plan doses were -0.61% to 1.78% for the clinical target volume and -11.74% to 8.11% for organs at risk (OARs), although an increase greater than 2% in OAR dose only occurred in 3 cases, each for a single OAR. All cases had at least 2 fractions with 1 or more constraint violations. However, in nearly all instances, constraints were still met in the summation plan despite multiple single-fraction violations. Conclusions: Daily ART on a 1.5T MR-linac using an online ATP workflow is safe and clinically feasible for HNC and results in delivered doses consistent with planned doses. (C) 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据