4.7 Article

Immediate sale or stock-up: value of rent-to-own contracts for experience goods

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH
卷 60, 期 5, 页码 1709-1736

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2020.1869342

关键词

Pricing; rent-to-own contracts; experience goods; customer choice behaviour; value of information

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71831007]
  2. National Key R&D Program of China [2020AAA0103800]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper examines the impact of uncertain future values of high-value experience goods on consumer purchasing decisions and speculation behavior, studying the profitability of rent-to-own contracts for firms based on optimal pricing decisions for consumers and speculators, as well as the influence of future prices under different models.
Many high-value experience goods, such as pianos and Chinese zithers, are usually characterized by uncertain future values. As such, a portion of customers (called 'consumers') may hesitate to buy the product because they are unsure of the product's actual value and/or they may expect to buy the product at a lower price in the future. Moreover, the fluctuating future value creates arbitrage opportunities for another group of customers (called 'speculators') who may benefit from stocking up a product and reselling it at a higher price at a future time. Considering a firm that sells a limited number of high-value experience goods over two periods, this paper investigates the profitability of a rent-to-own (R2O) contract, under which a consumer can return the product in the future period (e.g. when it turns out to be inappropriate) or buy the product at the realised future price. We study the optimal pricing decisions involved in the R2O contract for two scenarios. In the base model, the uncertain future price is exogenously given, and in the extended model, the future price is endogenously determined by the firm and speculators. Numerical experiments are conducted to evaluate the value of R2O contracts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据