4.3 Article

A novel alginate-gelatin microcapsule to enhance bone differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS AS
DOI: 10.1080/00914037.2020.1848828

关键词

Bone tissue engineering; CQD-Alginate-Gelatin NC; encapsulation; differentiation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study effectively differentiated mesenchymal stem cells into bone tissue using a Carbon Quantum Dots-Alginate-Gelatin nanocomposite as microcapsules and a scaffold. The unique structure of the Alginate-Gelatin nanocomposite played a key role in promoting osteogenesis of MSCs, demonstrating higher effectiveness compared to Alginate-Gelatin composites without CQD.
Some designed macromolecules may be suitable substitutes for damaged tissue. This study aimed to use a novel Carbon Quantum Dots (CQD)-Alginate-Gelatin nanocomposite (NC) in the form of the microcapsule and as a scaffold for differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells into bone tissue. The CQD nanoparticles (NPs) were synthesized by the hydrothermal method and were characterized by FTIR, zeta potential, and DLS analysis. Alginate was used as a porous and flexible basis for the proper nutrition of the cells and keeping them safe from the body's immune system. To improve the biodegradability of CQD-alginate NC, gelatin protein was added to the NC. The CQD was employed at the concentration of 100 mu g/ml and after placing the cells in the NC, microcapsules were made using the microdroplet technique. The binding and proliferation of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in microcapsules were examined by DAPI staining and MTT. Also, bone differentiation of proliferated MSCs was investigated by evaluating the activity of alkaline phosphatase. The results showed that Alginate-Gelatin NC with its unique structure has an effective role in MSCs osteogenesis. Consequently, Alginate-Gelatin NC has been a perfect base for the performance of CQD NPs, so that, CQD-Alginate-Gelatin NC osteogenesis is higher than that of Alginate-Gelatin (CQD-free) composites after 14 days. [GRAPHICS]

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据