4.1 Article

Lipopeptide Biosurfactant from Acinetobacter junii B6: A Promising Natural Surfactant for Promoting Angiogenesis

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10989-021-10160-9

关键词

Lipopeptide biosurfactant; Acinetobacter junii; Angiogenesis; Wound healing

资金

  1. Kerman University of Medical Sciences (KMU) [97000960]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lipopeptide biosurfactants (LPBs) were studied for their effect on human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs), showing no significant proliferative effect but an increase in migration and tube formation rates at a concentration of 300 μg/mL, along with enhanced expression of angiogenic factors.
Lipopeptide biosurfactants (LPBs) display unique properties with widespread therapeutic applications. Recently, the wound healing activity of LPBs has received more attention. However, few investigations have focused on the healing mechanisms of these compounds, particularly those that are associated with the angiogenic pathways. Therefore, the current study aimed at investigating the effect of a natural LPB produced by Acinetobacter. junii B6 on the angiogenic potential of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs). The proliferation, migration, and three-dimensional tube forming potential of HUVECs were examined after treatment with LPB. By using western blotting, the expression of angiogenic-related genes such as hypoxia-inducible factor-1 alpha (HIF-1 alpha) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) were also measured. LPB demonstrated no significant proliferative or cytotoxic effect on HUVECs at the concentrations lower than 600 mu g/mL. Moreover, LPB at a concentration of 300 mu g/mL caused a significant increase in the rates of migration and tube formation of HUVECs. LPB also enhanced the protein expression levels of HIF-1 alpha and VEGF in HUVECs in a dose-dependent manner. The present results suggest that LPB might be considered a potential wound healing agent by modifying some angiogenic factors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据