4.5 Article

Protracted Abstinence From Extended Cocaine Self-Administration Is Associated With Hypodopaminergic Activity in the VTA but Not in the SNc

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ijnp/pyaa096

关键词

Cocaine; dopamine; substantia nigra pars compacta; ventral tegmental area; withdrawal

资金

  1. Institute National de la Sante et de la Recherche Medicale
  2. Centre National pour la Recherche Scientifique
  3. University of Poitiers
  4. Fondation de la Recherche Medicale (FRM) [DPA20140629806]
  5. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR JC) [ANR-15-CE37-0010]
  6. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-15-CE37-0010] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found that dopamine activity in the VTA is decreased in rats with extended access to cocaine, while there were no changes in dopamine activity in the SNc. These changes in VTA dopamine activity may contribute to the negative emotional state and the incubation of drug seeking during abstinence.
The chronic relapsing nature of cocaine addiction suggests that chronic cocaine exposure produces persistent neuroadaptations that may be temporally and regionally dynamic in brain areas such as the dopaminergic (DA) system. We have previously shown altered metabolism of DA-target structures, the ventral and dorsal striatum, between early and late abstinence. However, specific changes within the midbrain DA system were not investigated. Here, we investigated potential time- and region-specific changes of activity in the ventral tegmental area (VTA) and the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNc) in rats that had extended or limited access to cocaine and later underwent a period of abstinence. We found that DA activity is decreased only in the VTA in rats with extended access to cocaine, with no changes in SNc DA activity. These changes in VTA DA activity may participate in the negative emotional state and the incubation of drug seeking that occur during abstinence from cocaine.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据