4.5 Article

Experimental observations of the transition between heterogeneous to homogeneous nucleation regimes in flash-boiling atomization

期刊

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2020.103476

关键词

-

资金

  1. Minerva Research Center (Max Planck Society) [AZ5746940764]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This experimental study investigated the transition from heterogeneous to homogeneous nucleation in flash-boiling atomization using a high-pressure fluid flowing through a simple nozzle. The results showed that higher temperature led to lower mean droplet velocity in the heterogeneous-nucleation regime, but higher mean velocity and droplet size in the homogeneous-nucleation regime. Additionally, higher temperature or pressure resulted in smaller droplet sizes in the heterogeneous-nucleation regime, while in the homogeneous nucleation regime, higher temperature or pressure led to larger droplet sizes.
Here we present an experimental study of the transition from heterogeneous to homogeneous-nucleation in flash-boiling atomization. The study is based on a wide set of experimental results obtained with a high-pressure fluid flowing through a simple nozzle. We used the TSI's Phase Doppler Particle Analyzer to measure the spray characteristics; droplets velocity profile, mean velocity, droplets size and droplets size distribution. We conclude that in the heterogeneous-nucleation regime, a higher temperature results in droplets with a lower mean velocity. Upon transition to the homogeneous-nucleation regime at con-stant pressure, the mean velocity and the size of droplets noticeably increases. Likewise, while in the heterogeneous-nucleation regime, a higher temperature or a higher-pressure results in a lower droplets size (lower SMD), in the homogeneous nucleation regime this trend reverses for both, i.e., a higher temperature or a higher pressure results in a higher droplets size (higher SMD). (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据