4.7 Review

Cannabis sativa L. as a Natural Drug Meeting the Criteria of a Multitarget Approach to Treatment

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms22020778

关键词

Cannabis; phytocannabinoids (THC and CBD); terpenes; multitarget; receptors

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cannabis sativa L. is a valuable source of chemical compounds with pharmacological activity, primarily acting on receptors of the endocannabinoid system and other receptors to exhibit therapeutic effects. The synergistic actions of phytochemicals in Cannabis extracts enhance their bioavailability and penetration through the blood-brain barrier, contributing to their clinical use in treating various diseases.
Cannabis sativa L. turned out to be a valuable source of chemical compounds of various structures, showing pharmacological activity. The most important groups of compounds include phytocannabinoids and terpenes. The pharmacological activity of Cannabis (in epilepsy, sclerosis multiplex (SM), vomiting and nausea, pain, appetite loss, inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs), Parkinson's disease, Tourette's syndrome, schizophrenia, glaucoma, and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)), which has been proven so far, results from the affinity of these compounds predominantly for the receptors of the endocannabinoid system (the cannabinoid receptor type 1 (CB1), type two (CB2), and the G protein-coupled receptor 55 (GPR(55))) but, also, for peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR), glycine receptors, serotonin receptors (5-HT), transient receptor potential channels (TRP), and GPR, opioid receptors. The synergism of action of phytochemicals present in Cannabis sp. raw material is also expressed in their increased bioavailability and penetration through the blood-brain barrier. This review provides an overview of phytochemistry and pharmacology of compounds present in Cannabis extracts in the context of the current knowledge about their synergistic actions and the implications of clinical use in the treatment of selected diseases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据