4.7 Review

Hold on or Cut? Integrin- and MMP-Mediated Cell-Matrix Interactions in the Tumor Microenvironment

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms22010238

关键词

tumor microenvironment; extracellular matrix; integrins; matrix metalloproteinases; matrikines

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [SFB1009]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The tumor microenvironment (TME) is a key focus in cancer research and treatment, involving various components including ECM and modifying enzymes. Cells within the TME interact with the ECM, influencing tumor progression through feedback mechanisms involving cellular receptors, cytokines, and exosomes. Matrix remodeling in the TME, particularly by matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), plays a crucial role in modifying ECM barriers and releasing soluble ECM fragments that impact cells both within and outside the TME.
The tumor microenvironment (TME) has become the focus of interest in cancer research and treatment. It includes the extracellular matrix (ECM) and ECM-modifying enzymes that are secreted by cancer and neighboring cells. The ECM serves both to anchor the tumor cells embedded in it and as a means of communication between the various cellular and non-cellular components of the TME. The cells of the TME modify their surrounding cancer-characteristic ECM. This in turn provides feedback to them via cellular receptors, thereby regulating, together with cytokines and exosomes, differentiation processes as well as tumor progression and spread. Matrix remodeling is accomplished by altering the repertoire of ECM components and by biophysical changes in stiffness and tension caused by ECM-crosslinking and ECM-degrading enzymes, in particular matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs). These can degrade ECM barriers or, by partial proteolysis, release soluble ECM fragments called matrikines, which influence cells inside and outside the TME. This review examines the changes in the ECM of the TME and the interaction between cells and the ECM, with a particular focus on MMPs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据