4.7 Review

Pathogenic Impacts of Dysregulated Polycomb Repressive Complex Function in Hematological Malignancies

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms22010074

关键词

polycomb repressive complexes; hematologic malignancies; acute leukemia; myelodysplastic syndromes; myeloproliferative disease; synthetic lethality

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology [#19H05653, #19H05746] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Polycomb repressive complexes play a crucial role in maintaining hematopoietic stem cells and mutations in corresponding genes are associated with hematologic malignancies, leading to resistance to chemotherapy and poor prognosis. Recent studies have revealed that these gene mutations are druggable targets, and inhibitors have shown therapeutic efficacy for tumors.
Polycomb repressive complexes (PRCs) are epigenetic regulators that mediate repressive histone modifications. PRCs play a pivotal role in the maintenance of hematopoietic stem cells through repression of target genes involved in cell proliferation and differentiation. Next-generation sequencing technologies have revealed that various hematologic malignancies harbor mutations in PRC2 genes, such as EZH2, EED, and SUZ12, and PRC1.1 genes, such as BCOR and BCORL1. Except for the activating EZH2 mutations detected in lymphoma, most of these mutations compromise PRC function and are frequently associated with resistance to chemotherapeutic agents and poor prognosis. Recent studies have shown that mutations in PRC genes are druggable targets. Several PRC2 inhibitors, including EZH2-specific inhibitors and EZH1 and EZH2 dual inhibitors have shown therapeutic efficacy for tumors with and without activating EZH2 mutations. Moreover, EZH2 loss-of-function mutations appear to be attractive therapeutic targets for implementing the concept of synthetic lethality. Further understanding of the epigenetic dysregulation associated with PRCs in hematological malignancies should improve treatment outcomes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据