4.7 Review

Therapeutic Potential of Antimicrobial Peptides in Polymicrobial Biofilm-Associated Infections

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms22020482

关键词

antimicrobial peptides; host defense peptides; polymicrobial infections; biofilms; mixed infections; wound infections; lung infections; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Staphylococcus aureus

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Many chronic infections have a polymicrobial etiology, posing challenges in treatment. Microbial communities form biofilms that are resistant to therapy, while interactions affect pathogen susceptibility. AMPs show therapeutic potential in mixed infections but may have limitations.
It is widely recognized that many chronic infections of the human body have a polymicrobial etiology. These include diabetic foot ulcer infections, lung infections in cystic fibrosis patients, periodontitis, otitis, urinary tract infections and even a proportion of systemic infections. The treatment of mixed infections poses serious challenges in the clinic. First, polymicrobial communities of microorganisms often organize themselves as biofilms that are notoriously recalcitrant to antimicrobial therapy and clearance by the host immune system. Secondly, a plethora of interactions among community members may affect the expression of virulence factors and the susceptibility to antimicrobials of individual species in the community. Therefore, new strategies able to target multiple pathogens in mixed populations need to be urgently developed and evaluated. In this regard, antimicrobial or host defense peptides (AMPs) deserve particular attention as they are endowed with many favorable features that may serve to this end. The aim of the present review is to offer a comprehensive and updated overview of studies addressing the therapeutic potential of AMPs in mixed infections, highlighting the opportunities offered by this class of antimicrobials in the fight against polymicrobial infections, but also the limits that may arise in their use for this type of application.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据