4.7 Article

TODIM method for multiple attribute group decision making based on cumulative prospect theory with 2-tuple linguistic neutrosophic sets

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS
卷 36, 期 3, 页码 1199-1222

出版社

WILEY-HINDAWI
DOI: 10.1002/int.22338

关键词

2‐ tuple linguistic neutrosophic sets; cumulative prospect theory; multiattribute group decision making (MAGDM); TODIM

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The article presents a new solution for MAGDM problems, the CPT-2TLN-TODIM method, which integrates cumulative prospect theory and 2-tuple linguistic neutrosophic sets to ensure relatively objective attribute weights. The method considers the psychological state of decision makers and has been applied in network security assessment team to verify its practicability. The reliability of the method is confirmed through comparison with other existing methods, indicating potential for further exploration in different fields.
The 2-tuple linguistic neutrosophic set (2TLNS) does a good job in coping with vague and uncertain environments and has been widely used in numerous fields. In this article, we come up with a new solution of multiple attribute group decision-making (MAGDM) problems, named as the modified TODIM method based on cumulative prospect theory and 2-tuple linguistic neutrosophic sets (CPT-2TLN-TODIM method). To ensure relatively objective attribute weights, the CRITIC is integrated into this new model in this paper. The CPT-2TLN-TODIM method fully considers the psychological state of decision makers that makes it more realistic. What's more, we introduce the application of CPT-2TLN-TODIM method in the evaluation of network security assessment team for verifying the practicability of the CPT-2TLN-TODIM method. And finally, the reliability of CPT-2TLN-TODIM method is confirmed by comparing with other existed methods. In the immediate future, we will further explore the application of this method in other fields and keep trying to put forward more scientific and reasonable methods to solve MAGDM problems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据