4.6 Article

An Advanced Stochastic Risk Assessment Approach Proposal Based on KEMIRA-M, QFD and Fine-Kinney Hybridization

出版社

WORLD SCIENTIFIC PUBL CO PTE LTD
DOI: 10.1142/S0219622021500036

关键词

KEMIRA-M; advanced QFD; Fine– Kinney; distribution; correlation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An advanced stochastic risk assessment approach based on AV-QFD and KEMIRA-M was proposed in this study, aiming to perform a new criterion weighting procedure based on different distributions. The method includes obtaining the importance degree of each criterion and ranking criteria for each CS using AV-QFD.
In this study, an advanced stochastic risk assessment approach based on integration of advanced version of quality function deployment (AV-QFD) and Modified Kemeny Median Indicator Rank Accordance (KEMIRA-M) is proposed. It is aimed to perform a new criterion weighting procedure based on four different distributions as uniform, symmetric triangular, left asymmetric triangular, right asymmetric triangular distributions. The AV-QFD includes correlations between criteria (top roof of QFD), risk degrees (RDs) of risk types (RTs) (customer needs part of QFD), correlations between RTs and criteria sets (CSs) (in the middle of QFD) to obtain the criteria priorities. Correlations on the top roof of QFD comprises three types: correlations between criteria in the first CS, correlations between criteria in the second CS and correlations between criteria in both CSs. Additionally, Fine-Kinney method is performed in AV-QFD to compute RDs of RTs in the customer needs part. Then for each expert, the correlation-based importance degree (CBID) of each criterion is obtained to rank criteria for each CS. MATLAB code was performed to see the effect of different trial numbers and replications on risk assessment. It was observed that although uniform distribution provides the best value, the same alternative ranking was obtained for all distributions. In addition, right asymmetric triangular distribution converged to the best value rapidly in practice made in this study.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据