4.7 Article

Photocatalytic hydrogen evolution of nanoporous CoFe2O4 and NiFe2O4 for water splitting

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 46, 期 7, 页码 5369-5377

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.11.107

关键词

CoFe2O4; Mesopores; Hydrogen generation; Photocatalysts

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51771141]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The spinels CoFe2O4 and NiFe2O4 were prepared as nanoporous photocatalysts by dealloying and calcination, showing good hydrogen generation rates through water splitting. CoFe2O4 exhibited higher performance due to its larger specific surface area and higher electron transfer rate compared to NiFe2O4. The results suggest that CoFe2O4 and NiFe2O4 are promising photocatalysts for hydrogen generation.
The spinels CoFe2O4 and NiFe2O4 of nanoporous photocatalysts were prepared by dealloying and calcination. The photocatalytic performance for the hydrogen generation rate via water splitting was measured. The results revealed that CoFe2O4 exhibits a sheet-like nanoporous structure and that abundant mesopores are distributed in the nanosheets. NiFe2O4 shows a typical pore-ligament structure. The measurements show that hydrogen generation is exhibited by both oxides because the bandgap of CoFe2O4 and NiFe2O4 is higher than the water oxidization potential. The hydrogen generation rate is approximately 0.088 mmol h d(-1) g(-1) for CoFe2O4 and 0.026 mmol h d(-1) g(-1) for NiFe2O4 when the TEOA (10 vol%) sacrificial agent is adopted. This performance is significantly higher than that of methanol as the scavenger because TEOA increases the pH value of the solution, changes the negative shift in the conduction band energy level and improves the electron transport efficiency. The higher performance of CoFe2O4 is attributed to its larger specific surface area, ample unimpeded penetration diffusion paths and higher electron transfer rate. (C) 2020 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据